The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) has published the responses to its Discussion Paper, Towards Integrated Reporting – Communicating Value in the 21st Century. More than 215 responses submitted to the IIRC are available online, alphabetically, through the drop-down menu under the green Discussion Paper tab. The IIRC plans to publish a summary of comments by the end of March 2012.
So far, 61 companies have agreed to participate in the Pilot Program to test a new integrated reporting framework as it is developed. There are still opportunities to participate in the Program, especially for companies in North America, South America and Asia. The IIRC is also establishing an Investor Network, which will help shape integrated reporting to meet investors' needs.
Nick Ridehalgh, a senior director with KPMG, says integrated reporting is a chance for CFOs to drive change management by showing they understand the short-term, medium-term and long-term goals of the business and communicate better with the capital markets. Watch the video “Why adopt integrated reporting?” at The Australian Financial Review online.
In addition, PwC in the UK recorded a live webcast called “Business reporting in this economic environment: What to action now and consider for the year ahead” to help identify what makes good reporting. The live webcast aims to share insights on issues for management and the board, to explain what investors want to see in the annual report, and to look ahead at what is likely to change.
With market confidence shaken, there has been a positive response from investors and regulators to those companies that provide some additional, pertinent disclosures to help reassure the markets. This means demonstrating that the critical business issues, such as securing funding for borrowings, acquisitions or capital projects, are being effectively managed. It means inspiring confidence in the business model and its resilience in this economic environment. And, it means building trust in the appropriate governance of the business. The webcast looks at some of the important issues that the board and audit committees are focusing on as they sign off on annual reports.
Monday, February 27, 2012
Update and Current Perspectives on Integrated Business Reporting
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
Who’s Out There? CFOs can’t ignore social media. But what’s the ROI?
The power of social media — or, at least, its potential power — is not lost on American companies. Many are using it successfully for everything from new-product marketing to employee collaboration to innovative and very effective forms of customer service. But, most companies are struggling to turn nascent, ad hoc efforts into something resembling an actual strategy.
Clearly, social media engages enormous numbers of people: how else to explain how Starbucks got 8,006,349 Facebook “likes” (as of early December 2011) for its Frappuccino. More broadly, the numbers on social media adoption are spectacular. As of December, Facebook claimed 800 million active users worldwide, with 50% logging on every day. Twitter reported an average of 460,000 accounts created per day late last fall, with an average of 1 billion tweets per week. As of November 3, 2011, LinkedIn had 135 million members in more than 200 countries; two new users join every second.
That action is not just limited to consumers. A survey of 4,261 global executives conducted by McKinsey late last year found 72% reporting that their companies deployed at least one social technology. A November 2011 Towers Watson study of 604 global organizations found 69% planning to increase their use of social media tools over the next 12 months.
Read the full online article “Who’s Out There?” at CFO.com. For additional insight, refer to the CICA Practical Guidance Series, especially Using the Internet in Corporate Reporting: Practical Guidance for Managing Web 2.0 and Social Media. Also, see the four-part series on Using the Internet in Corporate Reporting (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4).
Clearly, social media engages enormous numbers of people: how else to explain how Starbucks got 8,006,349 Facebook “likes” (as of early December 2011) for its Frappuccino. More broadly, the numbers on social media adoption are spectacular. As of December, Facebook claimed 800 million active users worldwide, with 50% logging on every day. Twitter reported an average of 460,000 accounts created per day late last fall, with an average of 1 billion tweets per week. As of November 3, 2011, LinkedIn had 135 million members in more than 200 countries; two new users join every second.
That action is not just limited to consumers. A survey of 4,261 global executives conducted by McKinsey late last year found 72% reporting that their companies deployed at least one social technology. A November 2011 Towers Watson study of 604 global organizations found 69% planning to increase their use of social media tools over the next 12 months.
Read the full online article “Who’s Out There?” at CFO.com. For additional insight, refer to the CICA Practical Guidance Series, especially Using the Internet in Corporate Reporting: Practical Guidance for Managing Web 2.0 and Social Media. Also, see the four-part series on Using the Internet in Corporate Reporting (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4).
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Sustainability 2.0: Using sustainability to drive business innovation and growth
Sustainability can be a game changer. It can drive innovation by introducing new design constraints that shape how key resources— energy, carbon, water, materials and waste—are used in products and processes. It can also suggest areas where innovation can pay off especially well. These five resources are ubiquitous throughout an organization’s supply chain, and the potential to boost efficiency and cut costs across these resources is significant.
Sustainability-driven innovation goes beyond designing green products and packaging solely on their inherent virtue. It entails improving business operations and processes to become more efficient, with a goal of dramatically reducing costs and waste. It’s also about insulating a business from the risk of resource price shocks and shortages. Taken together these enhancements can deliver business benefits that go far beyond the bottom line—whether it’s improving the overall carbon footprint, enhancing the brand image or engaging employees in a more profound way.
Often, there are significant opportunities for organizations to use sustainability to drive innovation and improve how they do business. A methodical analysis can highlight areas ripe for attention. Taking it a step further, that analysis may yield even greater benefits if it is extended beyond the company’s own walls through collaboration with suppliers, customers and alliance partners. Changes to each link in the supply chain can affect everything upstream and downstream and create financial benefits for everyone involved.
To reach this new frontier, leading organizations are taking a hard look inside their operations and across their supply chains, assessing where they are, prioritizing initiatives, and then formulating a broad sustainability strategy to foster product and process innovation to achieve their goals. They are also adopting metrics that more accurately measure their progress and improve their image in the marketplace. Companies that achieve this vision have the opportunity to enhance revenue and brand value, engage effectively with key stakeholders, manage risks and reduce costs.
To learn more, read the complimentary article reprint “Sustainability 2.0: Using sustainability to drive business innovation and growth” in Deloitte Review, Issue 10, January 2012. The article is also available for reading online.
Sustainability-driven innovation goes beyond designing green products and packaging solely on their inherent virtue. It entails improving business operations and processes to become more efficient, with a goal of dramatically reducing costs and waste. It’s also about insulating a business from the risk of resource price shocks and shortages. Taken together these enhancements can deliver business benefits that go far beyond the bottom line—whether it’s improving the overall carbon footprint, enhancing the brand image or engaging employees in a more profound way.
Often, there are significant opportunities for organizations to use sustainability to drive innovation and improve how they do business. A methodical analysis can highlight areas ripe for attention. Taking it a step further, that analysis may yield even greater benefits if it is extended beyond the company’s own walls through collaboration with suppliers, customers and alliance partners. Changes to each link in the supply chain can affect everything upstream and downstream and create financial benefits for everyone involved.
To reach this new frontier, leading organizations are taking a hard look inside their operations and across their supply chains, assessing where they are, prioritizing initiatives, and then formulating a broad sustainability strategy to foster product and process innovation to achieve their goals. They are also adopting metrics that more accurately measure their progress and improve their image in the marketplace. Companies that achieve this vision have the opportunity to enhance revenue and brand value, engage effectively with key stakeholders, manage risks and reduce costs.
To learn more, read the complimentary article reprint “Sustainability 2.0: Using sustainability to drive business innovation and growth” in Deloitte Review, Issue 10, January 2012. The article is also available for reading online.
Friday, February 10, 2012
Integrated Reporting: The New Big Picture
Financial statements are becoming increasingly long and complex with vast tomes of technical detail, requiring a high level of financial expertise to interpret. Complicating matters further, the world has at least two primary sets of standards under which these financial statements are prepared, although a convergence project is underway.
Beyond the financial reporting complexity issues, there is the reality that the tangible assets included in financial statements reflect a steadily diminishing component of shareholder value. Since 1983, when tangible assets represented 83% of market value, to 2009, when they represented only 19%, there has clearly been a change in business models that may not be fully reflected in traditional financial statements. Current financial statements often do not include the “true” value of inputs from, or reliance on, natural capital and other forms of capital. Conditions are ripe for new ideas.
Today, companies produce an increasing array of reports not necessarily linked to the financial statements. Governance issues, including executive pay, are sometimes reported on, as well as some of the impacts of the business on society and the environment. But, these are often reported to different audiences, in different formats and at different times. In this context, the idea of simplifying all the reporting under a consistent banner—integrated reporting—is very attractive.
Just as most of the world has moved steadily toward the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the progression toward a single, global, common framework for integrated reporting seems all but inevitable. Less clear, however, is the timing of adoption, which may be affected by a variety of economic, political, social and other factors.
To learn more, read the complimentary article reprint “Integrated Reporting: The New Big Picture” in Deloitte Review, Issue 10, January 2012 (also available online).
Beyond the financial reporting complexity issues, there is the reality that the tangible assets included in financial statements reflect a steadily diminishing component of shareholder value. Since 1983, when tangible assets represented 83% of market value, to 2009, when they represented only 19%, there has clearly been a change in business models that may not be fully reflected in traditional financial statements. Current financial statements often do not include the “true” value of inputs from, or reliance on, natural capital and other forms of capital. Conditions are ripe for new ideas.
Today, companies produce an increasing array of reports not necessarily linked to the financial statements. Governance issues, including executive pay, are sometimes reported on, as well as some of the impacts of the business on society and the environment. But, these are often reported to different audiences, in different formats and at different times. In this context, the idea of simplifying all the reporting under a consistent banner—integrated reporting—is very attractive.
Just as most of the world has moved steadily toward the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the progression toward a single, global, common framework for integrated reporting seems all but inevitable. Less clear, however, is the timing of adoption, which may be affected by a variety of economic, political, social and other factors.
To learn more, read the complimentary article reprint “Integrated Reporting: The New Big Picture” in Deloitte Review, Issue 10, January 2012 (also available online).
Monday, February 6, 2012
Making Corporate Reports Relevant - A Call to Action
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS) has a vision of corporate reporting that is simple: a readable and concise report that tells the story of the business – summarizing the key aspects of performance and prospects – with the detailed disclosures easily available from the company’s website. There is a growing dissatisfaction with a corporate reporting process viewed by many as an exercise in regulatory compliance. Often, stakeholders consider the preliminary results announcement and related presentations to be more relevant and useful than the full annual report. The reform of corporate reporting is now a global priority.
Accordingly, the ICAS has issued a call to action. It states that: “The time for debate and discussion is running out. Quality corporate reporting is fundamental to the operation of effective global capital markets, yet financial statements are increasingly being regarded as inaccessible, incomprehensible and inconsistent with the way in which companies are operated and managed. Our Short Form Report represents a significant improvement in communication with users and offers a next step which could be implemented quickly and with relative ease.”
It also states that: “We believe that the process of producing a Short Form Report following the above principles is a useful one, giving the directors an opportunity to tell their own story. Where this could replace an Annual Review and Summary Financial Statements and ultimately form the basis of a company’s results announcement, we believe it would not be an additional burden but a significant improvement in the delivery of quality corporate reporting. ICAS will now take forward these proposals in the context of the various consultations and the development of integrated reporting, and we will continue to exert our global influence in this critical debate.”
For more information, refer to the ICAS website and read the recently-issued publication Making Corporate Reports Relevant.
Accordingly, the ICAS has issued a call to action. It states that: “The time for debate and discussion is running out. Quality corporate reporting is fundamental to the operation of effective global capital markets, yet financial statements are increasingly being regarded as inaccessible, incomprehensible and inconsistent with the way in which companies are operated and managed. Our Short Form Report represents a significant improvement in communication with users and offers a next step which could be implemented quickly and with relative ease.”
It also states that: “We believe that the process of producing a Short Form Report following the above principles is a useful one, giving the directors an opportunity to tell their own story. Where this could replace an Annual Review and Summary Financial Statements and ultimately form the basis of a company’s results announcement, we believe it would not be an additional burden but a significant improvement in the delivery of quality corporate reporting. ICAS will now take forward these proposals in the context of the various consultations and the development of integrated reporting, and we will continue to exert our global influence in this critical debate.”
For more information, refer to the ICAS website and read the recently-issued publication Making Corporate Reports Relevant.
Saturday, February 4, 2012
FEE Factsheet on Integrated Reporting – January 2012
The FEE (Fédération des Experts-comptables Européens - Federation of European Accountants) initially published a Factsheet on Integrated Reporting in January 2011, introducing the concept as an emerging approach to reporting by organizations. Since then, debates and developments around integrated reporting have grown and will continue.
According to a recent FEE news release, “Integrated Reporting is seen as a major development in corporate reporting. FEE releases a factsheet explaining how integrated reporting differs from traditional reporting and highlighting some of the steps taken by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). Planned actions from the IIRC include publishing an analysis of the responses received on the Discussion Paper in March 2012.”
For more information, read the FEE paper “Integrated Reporting Update, January 2012.” Also, read the December 14, 2011, FEE Comment Letter to the IIRC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)